McCrary v. Rivard
Petitioner: Darrius McCrary
Respondent: Steve Rivard
Case Number: 2:2014cv14485
Filed: November 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Gratiot
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Presiding Judge: Laurie J. Michelson
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 OPINION and ORDER Denying 9 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EKar)
January 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 OPINION and ORDER re 4 MOTION to Stay - Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (JJoh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCrary v. Rivard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Darrius McCrary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steve Rivard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?