Anderson v. Jutzy et al
| Robert Anderson |
| Kevin Allen Jutzy, Raul Tumada, Badawi Abellatif and Angela Vatrino |
| 2:2015cv11727 |
| May 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Macomb |
| David M. Lawson |
| R. Steven Whalen |
| Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER Adopting 58 Report and Recommendation, and Dismissing the Plaintiff's Complaint Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 46 Motion to Appoint Counsel - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANTS BADAWI ABELLATIF AND RAUL TUMADA. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SSch)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S 37 Motion to Compel - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Adopting in part 27 Adopting Report and Recommendation, Overruling Plaintiff's 32 Objections in part, and Granting Defendant Vatrino's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SSch)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 22 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 19 Motion to Conduct Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
