Basel et al v. Bielaczyc et al
Emil Basel, Lola Hellem and Carmella Basel |
Mary Jane Klenoski, Chester Bielaczyc, John Dempsey, R Bernard Houston and Carrington Gustafson |
4:1974cv40135 |
June 19, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Flint Office |
Wayne |
Gadola |
Civil Rights: Welfare |
No cause code entered |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER Adopting in part and rejecting in part 20 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiffs' objections to the report and recommendation are sustained in part and overruled in part; Plaintiffs' petition to hold Defendants in contempt 8 are den ied; 5 Motion to Vacate filed by R Bernard Houston, Chester Bielaczyc, John Dempsey, Carrington Gustafson, Mary Jane Klenoski is granted; FURTHER ORDERED that the injunction entered in his case be dissolved and the consent judgment is vacated and this Court's jurisdiction in this matter is immediately TERMINATED. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (PMil) |
Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to Deny 8 Petition To Find Defendants in Contempt filed by Lola Hellem, Emil Basel, Carmella Basel, to Grant 5 MOTION to Vacate Consent Judgment filed by R Bernard Houston, Chester Bielaczyc, John Dempsey, Carrington Gustafson, Mary Jane Klenoski, and to Dismiss case - Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia M Morgan. (JJoh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.