Select Specialty Hospital-Ann Arbor v. The Secretary of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff: Select Specialty Hospital-Ann Arbor
Defendant: The Secretary of Health and Human Services
Case Number: 4:2014cv14412
Filed: November 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Flint Office
County: Washtenaw
Presiding Judge: Terrence G. Berg
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Nature of Suit: Medicare Act
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 OPINION and ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Motion to Dismiss re 7 Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (KJac)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Select Specialty Hospital-Ann Arbor v. The Secretary of Health and Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Select Specialty Hospital-Ann Arbor
Represented By: Sean F. Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Secretary of Health and Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?