Harris v. Bergh
Petitioner: Rodney Harris
Respondent: David Bergh
Case Number: 4:2015cv11122
Filed: March 25, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Lapeer
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Stafford
Presiding Judge: George Caram Steeh
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 OPINION and ORDER signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh Granting Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment, Dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability. (Grimes, K.)
April 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying 3 petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Bergh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodney Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Bergh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?