King et al v. Curtis et al
Madison King, Matt Steward, Tom Kosten and John Doe |
Chad Curtis, Lakewood Public Schools, Lakewood Public Schools Board of Education and Unknown Part(y)(ies) |
1:2014cv00403 |
April 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Southern Division (1) Office |
Ionia |
Janet T. Neff |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 453 OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 434 ; denying objections 449 ; granting in part and denying without prejudice in part motion 409 ; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw) |
Filing 300 OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 285 and 286 ; Third-party defendant PCMI's motion for summary judgment 214 is GRANTED and the Third-party complaint is DISMISSED; Lakewood Defendants' motion for summ ary judgment 215 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment 217 is DENIED; Unknown Defendants "James Roe 1-10" are DISMISSED without prejudice; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb) |
Filing 207 OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 190 ; Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 122 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.