Kelley #259579 v. Atkinson, et al
| Marcus Kelley #259579 |
| Kimberly Atkinson, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Sariano, Unknown Kerckart, Unknown Frazier, Unknown Carrick, Unknown Zimmerman, Unknown Parr, Unknown Cowan, Unknown Nettleston, Unknown Parties #1, Unknown Wallis, Unknown Wilson, Unknown Rafaele, Duncan MacLaren, Unknown Wollan, Unknown Parties #2, Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #3, Unknown Baker and Unknown Reynolds |
| 2:2014cv00117 |
| May 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Northern Division (2) Office |
| Chippewa |
| R. Allan Edgar |
| Timothy P. Greeley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 87 re 83 ; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 80 re 79 : Plaintiff's motion 79 is GRANTED; Defendant Lewis is substituted for Defendant Wilson; Defendant Wilson is DISMISSED; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
|
Filing
13
OPINION ; signed by Judge R. Allan Edgar (Judge R. Allan Edgar, cam)
|
|
Filing
5
OPINION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Western District of Michigan. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (DPer) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 5/29/2014.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
