Osthus v. Laborers District Council of Minnesota and NorthDakota

Petitioner: Marlin O. Osthus
Respondent: Laborers District Council of Minnesota and NorthDakota
Case Number: 0:2010cv03603
Filed: August 18, 2010
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: David S. Doty
Referring Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 29:151
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 4, 2010 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Denying 1 Petition for Injunction filed by Marlin O. Osthus (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 10/4/2010. (PJM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osthus v. Laborers District Council of Minnesota and NorthDakota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marlin O. Osthus
Represented By: Nichole-NA Burgess-Peel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Laborers District Council of Minnesota and NorthDakota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.