Iheme v. Smith et al
| Michael Collins Iheme |
| Michelle Smith and Tony Forchas |
| 0:2012cv02270 |
| September 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Washington |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Jeffrey J. Keyes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Plaintiff Michael Collins Iheme's objections (Doc. No. 15 ) to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's November 5, 2013 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. 2. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes 's November 5, 2012 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 5 ) is ADOPTED. 3. Plaintiff Michael Collins Iheme's motion to be excused from paying an initial partial filing fee (Doc. No. 4 ) is GRANTED. 4. Plaintiff Michael Collins Iheme' ;s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2 ) is DENIED. 5. This action is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). 6. Plaintiff Michael Collins Iheme is required to pay the unpaid balance of theCourt filin g fee, namely the full $350, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 7. The dismissal of this action is counted as a strike against Plaintiff Michael Collins Iheme for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 5/6/2013. (BJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
