Barney v. English
Petitioner: D. A. Barney
Respondent: N. C. English
Case Number: 0:2012cv02415
Filed: September 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Waseca
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopting 4 Report and Recommendation; DENYING as moot 5 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs; Petitioners application for habeas corpus relief 1 is DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 12/11/12. (TLU) cc: D. A. Barney. Modified on 12/11/2012 (lmb).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barney v. English
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: N. C. English
Represented By: John E Kokkinen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: D. A. Barney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?