Conrad v. Xcel Energy, Inc.
||Xcel Energy, Inc.
||November 6, 2012
||Minnesota District Court
||Franklin L. Noel
||Patrick J. Schiltz
|Nature of Suit:
||Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 5, 2013
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's motion to dismiss 3 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. a. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Count III of plaintiff's complaint [1-1], and Count III is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. b. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. 2. Plaintiff's motion to remand 11 is DENIED. 3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c)(3), the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's remaining claims. Accordingly, those claims are REMANDED to the Minnesota District Court, Fourth Judicial District. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on April 5, 2013. (clg)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System