Burks v. State of Minnesota
Plaintiff: Jerome Burks
Defendant: State of Minnesota
Case Number: 0:2013cv00823
Filed: April 5, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Tony N. Leung
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopt Report and Recommendation 24 Report and Recommendation. 1.Burkss 7 amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Relief is dismissed with prejudice(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 29, 2014. (DML) cc: Burks on 12/29/2014 (LPH).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burks v. State of Minnesota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Minnesota
Represented By: Mark A Ostrem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerome Burks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?