Burks v. State of Minnesota
Jerome Burks |
State of Minnesota |
0:2013cv00823 |
April 5, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Washington |
Tony N. Leung |
John R. Tunheim |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopt Report and Recommendation 24 Report and Recommendation. 1.Burkss 7 amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Relief is dismissed with prejudice(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 29, 2014. (DML) cc: Burks on 12/29/2014 (LPH). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Burks v. State of Minnesota | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State of Minnesota | |
Represented By: | Mark A Ostrem |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jerome Burks | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.