Simmon v. Colvin

Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Briant Simmon
Case Number: 0:2013cv03136
Filed: November 14, 2013
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Wright
Presiding Judge: Donovan W. Frank
Referring Judge: Janie S. Mayeron
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 12, 2015 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron's December 2, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 17 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13 ) is DENIED. 3. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15 ) is GRANTED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 1/12/2015. (BJS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simmon v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Briant Simmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.