Urrutia v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Winona Marie Urrutia
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 0:2014cv01603
Filed: May 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Carlton
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J. Keyes
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER: The report and recommendation [Docket No. 20 ] is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 10 ] is DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 12 ] is GRANTED. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on April 30, 2015. (CBC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Urrutia v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Winona Marie Urrutia
Represented By: Lionel H Peabody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Ann M Bildtsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?