Goertzen et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Plaintiff: Gene Goertzen and Rochelle K. Goertzen
Case Number: 0:2014cv03037
Filed: July 29, 2014
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Donovan W. Frank
Referring Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goertzen et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Represented By: Eliot M. Harris(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gene Goertzen
Represented By: Ryan Scott Jennings(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Christopher R. Best(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rochelle K. Goertzen
Represented By: Ryan Scott Jennings(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Christopher R. Best(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.