Favors v. Jesson
Plaintiff: Joseph Anthony Favors
Respondent: Lucinda Jesson
Case Number: 0:2014cv03473
Filed: September 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Carlton
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Petitioner's Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in state Custody [Docket No. 1] is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on August 12, 2015. (HAZ)(cc: Favors) Modified text on 8/12/2015 (ALM).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Favors v. Jesson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Anthony Favors
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lucinda Jesson
Represented By: Donald E Bruce
Represented By: James B Early
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?