Daywitt et al v. State of Minnesota et al
Kenneth S. Daywitt and Merel E. Bishop |
State of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Kevin Moser, Troy Basaraba, Ann Zimmerman, Scott Benoit, Sara Kulas and Brian Ninneman |
0:2014cv04526 |
October 28, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Carlton |
Leo I. Brisbois |
Michael J. Davis |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 50 Report and Recommendation(Written Opinion). Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, 36 , is DENIED with respect to Count 2's Section 1983 free exercise claim as alleged ag ainst Defendants Jesson, Johnston, and Moser in their official capacities, to the extent Plaintiffs seek injunctive and/or declaratory relief arising from Policy 303.020's suit coat prohibition. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, 36 , is DENIED with respect to Count 4 as alleged against the State entity Defendants and the individual Defendants in their official capacities, to the extent Plaintiffs seek injunctive and/or declaratory relief arising from Policy 303.020's suit coat prohibition. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, 36 , is GRANTED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/6/15. (KMW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.