Banks v. Rochester Public Schools District #535
Plaintiff: Robert Eugene Banks
Defendant: Rochester Public Schools District #535
Case Number: 0:2014cv04736
Filed: November 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Olmsted
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICEunder Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/26/15. (KMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Banks v. Rochester Public Schools District #535
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Eugene Banks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rochester Public Schools District #535
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?