Woodward v. Grandlienard
Petitioner: John Stephen Woodward
Respondent: Kent Grandlienard
Case Number: 0:2015cv00545
Filed: February 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Magnuson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Memorandum and Order adopting 5 Report and Recommendation, denying 1 Woodward's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Paul A. Magnuson on 6/4/2015. (APK) cc: Petitioner. Modified on 6/4/2015 (lmb).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodward v. Grandlienard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Stephen Woodward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kent Grandlienard
Represented By: James B Early
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: Peter R Marker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?