Allen v. Smith
Petitioner: Paris Dajon Allen
Respondent: Michelle Smith
Case Number: 0:2015cv01859
Filed: April 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J. Keyes
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 7 Report and Recommendation(Written Opinion). Petitioner Paris Dajon Allen's petition for a writ of habeas corpus 3 is DENIED WTIHOUT PREJUDICE. Allen's application to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is DENIED AS MOOT. Let Judgment be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 6/4/15. (KMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Paris Dajon Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michelle Smith
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: Lisa C Netzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?