Steady State Imaging, LLC v. General Electric Company
Steady State Imaging, LLC |
General Electric Company |
0:2017cv01048 |
April 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Hennepin |
Katherine M. Menendez |
John R. Tunheim |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 694 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 690 Motion to Review Cost Judgment. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on 2/6/2024. (KKM) |
Filing 670 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS denying 620 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; granting in part and denying in part 622 Motion to Alter/Amend/Correct Judgment; granting 628 Motion to Stay. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on 6/27/2023. (KKM) |
Filing 615 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Judgment for Plaintiff. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on 8/3/2022.(HMA) |
Filing 536 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 483 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 491 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 499 Motion in Limine. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 2/23/2021. (HMA) |
Filing 469 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 451 Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 3/25/2020. (HAZ) |
Filing 427 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 199 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 203 Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; denying 291 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; and denying 303 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 4/4/2019. (HAZ) |
Filing 189 ORDER denying 132 plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Evidence; granting in part and denying in part 138 defendant's Motion to Strike Pleading; amending 38 Scheduling Order. See Order for details. (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 5/2/2018. (BJP) |
Filing 121 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objections 92 are OVERRULED; the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 85 is ADOPTED; and Defendants Renewed Partial Motion to Dismiss 24 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 1/17/2018. (JMK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Steady State Imaging, LLC v. General Electric Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Steady State Imaging, LLC | |
Represented By: | Lisa B Ellingson |
Represented By: | Devan V Padmanabhan |
Represented By: | Paul J Robbennolt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: General Electric Company | |
Represented By: | Nicole S Frank |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.