Chisolm v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Edward Glen Chisolm
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2009cv00098
Filed: April 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits Office
County: Chickasaw
Presiding Judge: David A. Sanders
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:1383 Review of HHS Decision

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 JUDGMENT in favor of Commissioner of Social Security against Edward Glen Chisolm. CASE CLOSED. Signed by David A. Sanders on 5/13/10. (ncb, USDC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chisolm v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Glen Chisolm
Represented By: Elizabeth B. Fox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?