Johnston v. One America Productions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff Ellen Johnston alleges that defendants (1) invaded her privacy by filming her without her consent and showing her image in the movie Borat, and (2) portrayed her in a false light by showing her with her arms raised while Borat pretended to speak in tongue.
| Ellen Johnston |
| One America Productions, Inc. and Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation |
| 2:2007cv00042 |
| March 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Delta Division Office |
| Coahoma |
| S. Allan Alexander |
| W. Allen Pepper |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER STAYING CASE, including the case management conference previously scheduled for 10/23/2007, pending decision on interlocutory appeal. Signed by Judge Eugene M. Bogen on 10/18/2007. (maw, USDC)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by Judge W. Allen Pepper, Jr. on 10/02/2007. (pbs, USDC)
|
|
Filing
25
REPLY to Response to Motion re 21 MOTION to Alter Judgment dated August 22, 2007 or, in the Alternative, to Certify the Order for Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Entry of a Stay MOTION to Alter Judgment dated August 22, 2007 or, in the Alternative, to Certify the Order for Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Entry of a Stay filed by One America Productions, Inc., Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation. (Henegan, John)
|
|
Filing
24
RESPONSE to Motion re 21 MOTION to Alter Judgment dated August 22, 2007 or, in the Alternative, to Certify the Order for Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Entry of a Stay MOTION to Alter Judgment dated August 22, 2007 or, in the Alternative, to Certify the Order for Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Entry of a Stay filed by Ellen Johnston. (Luckett, William)
|
|
Filing
23
ANSWER to Complaint and Defenses by One America Productions, Inc., Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation. (Henegan, John)
|
|
Filing
20
INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1 Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 10/23/2007, 11:00 AM in Judge Bogen's Chambers before Eugene M. Bogen. FOURTEEN (14) days PRIOR to the Case Management Conference counsel shall submit to the Magistrate Judge a memorandum (3 page maximum). Signed by Judge Eugene M. Bogen on 8/23/07. (bdm, USDC)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 18 Order on Motion to Dismiss and Order on Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge W. Allen Pepper, Jr. on 8/22/2007. (pbs, USDC)
|
| Filing 17 |
| Filing 16 |
| Filing 15 |
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting Defendant's unopposed ore tenus motion for additional time to file rebuttal regarding motion to dismiss and to file an opposition to plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint. Responses due July 24, 2007. Signed by Judge W. Allen Pepper on 7/06/07. (pwh, USDC)
|
|
Filing
9
NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of Exhibit 2 to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by John C. Henegan on behalf of One America Productions, Inc., Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation. (Henegan, John)
|
|
Filing
6
STIPULATION of Dismissal of Defendant Everyman Pictures. (Luckett, William)
|
|
Filing
3
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge W. Allen Pepper, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Allan Alexander. (kmt, USDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
