Sahlein et al v. Red Oak Capital, Inc. et al
| Hugo Sahlein, Rita Sahlein, Steven Sahlein and Emeline Sahlein |
| Red Oak Capital, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Merscorp Holdings, Inc., Flagstar Bank, FSB, LSF7 Mortgage Acquisitions II, LLC, LSF7 Bermuda NPL V Trust, US Bank Trust, NA, Vericrest Financial, Inc., Volt 2011-NPL1 Holdings, LLC, Vericrest Opportunity Loan Trust 2011-NPL1, Volt NPL IX, LLC, Volt NPL IX Asset Holdings Trust, Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, NA, Marinosci Law Group, PC, Jane Doe Trusts and John Does |
| 3:2013cv00067 |
| March 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Oxford Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| S. Allan Alexander |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER granting 67 Motion to Dismiss; denying 71 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 77 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 78 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 79 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 2/20/15. (bds)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER denying 75 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/16/2014. (lec)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER granting 21 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 7/3/14. (bds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
