Forrest v. Colvin

Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Brenda Forrest
Case Number: 4:2013cv00094
Filed: May 20, 2013
Court: Mississippi Northern District Court
Office: Greenville Division Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Mills
Referring Judge: Jane M Virden
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 9, 2013 18 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of Brenda Forrest against Social Security Administration Commissioner c/o General Counsel. The case is REMANDED for further proceedings. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Jane M Virden on 12/9/13. (ncb)
January 7, 2014 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part 19 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Jane M Virden on 1/7/14. (ncb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Forrest v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenda Forrest
Represented By: Gary R. Parvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.