McFarland v. Brooks et al
| Takei McFarland |
| Stanley Brooks, Ed Cole, Earnest Lee, Tom Tabler, Richard Gipson, Henry Gipson, Faye Noel, Morgan Farnell, Jeffrey Brown and Donnis Chatman |
| 4:2014cv00090 |
| June 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Greenville Division Office |
| Sunflower |
| S. Allan Alexander |
| Debra M. Brown |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER granting 69 Motion for Reconsideration; denying as moot re 63 Second MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum filed by Takei McFarland, granting 64 MOTION to Continue Trial (Unopposed) filed by Takei McFarland; withdrawing 68 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued; withdrawing 67 Order on Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum, Order on Motion to Continue. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 11/1/16. (tab)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Summary Judgment; granted as to McFarland's claims against Richard Gipson; denied as to qualified immunity; and denied in all other respects.. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 3/21/16. (tab)
|
|
Filing
18
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Earnest Lee, Faye Noel, Tom Tabler, Jeffrey Brown and Morgan Farnell terminated.. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 2/9/15. (tab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
