Spooner v. Floore
Plaintiff: Michella Spooner
Defendant: Prentiss G. Floore
Case Number: 1:2015cv00109
Filed: April 1, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Southern Office
County: De Soto
Presiding Judge: John C. Gargiulo
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 111 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 71 Motion for Summary Judgment, and granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 76 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 7/25/16. (KWM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spooner v. Floore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michella Spooner
Represented By: David Reid Wamble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prentiss G. Floore
Represented By: Herman M. Hollensed, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?