Williams et al v. Rogers et al
| Elmer Williams and Cannon Williams |
| Brandon Rogers, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and John and Jane Does 1-10 |
| 2:2014cv00116 |
| July 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
| Forrest |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 26 Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Brandon Rogers. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on October 20, 2015 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment. Additionally, Plaintiffs may file an amended motion for default judgment as to Defendant Rogers within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiffs do not file an amended motion for default judgment in that time period, the Court will dismiss their claims against Rogers without prejudice for their failure to prosecute and comply with the Court's order. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on October 1, 2015 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 12 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on November 24, 2014 (dsl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
