Mid-Valley Pipeline Company v. Summit Seals, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mid-Valley Pipeline Company
Defendant: Summit Seals, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2012cv00066
Filed: May 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Western Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Walker
Presiding Judge: David C. Bramlette
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion in Limine Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 6/12/2013 (ECW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mid-Valley Pipeline Company v. Summit Seals, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Summit Seals, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mid-Valley Pipeline Company
Represented By: Kyle V. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?