Amos v. Stolzer et al
| Atari J. Amos |
| Unknown Stolzer, David Owens, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, Unknown Odem, Unknown Catel, D. Gegg, Keefe Group, R. Merz, A. Hulsey, Unknown Conrad, N. Burns, P. Kard, Unknown Miller, Unknown Mayfield, Unknown Del Rosario, Unknown McCaffrey, B. Berg, C. Schlenker, Ste. Genevieve County Sheriff's Department, Unknown Van Haar, N. Ems, S. Memhardt, C. Weinhold, A. Brown and K. Carrow |
| 1:2014cv00063 |
| May 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cape Girardeau Office |
| St. Genevieve |
| Stephen N. Limbaugh |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant P. Karol motion is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 2/9/16. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 29 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Atari J. Amos motion is DENIED without prejudice at this time.. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/2/15. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United State Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the complaint on defendant P. Kard through personal service at either his workplace, at the St. Genevieve County Jail, or wherever else his person may be found. See Beyer v. Pulaski Cnty Jail, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19338 (8th Cir. Oct. 10, 2014). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 2/25/15. (CSG)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of t his Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendant Kard in his official and individual capacities, according to the RLUIPA and First Amendment claims outlined above.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 199 7e(g)(2), defendant Kard shall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to the remaining defendants or on the remaining claims contained in plaintiff's complaint because, as to these defendants and claims, the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief c an be granted, or both. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. An Order of Partial Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Dated this 18th day of November, 2014. ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 12/18/2014.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/18/2014. (JMC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
