McCrary v. Hyte et al
Jerry McCrary |
Charles Wilson, Darron Hyte, Jordan Reavis, Unknown Mullins, Alfred Garcia, Paula Phillips, Michael Vincent and Kimberly Yarmy |
1:2014cv00145 |
October 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Cape Girardeau Office |
Mississippi |
Stephen N. Limbaugh |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 5 MOTION for Discovery filed by Plaintiff Jerry McCrary, 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff Jerry McCrary, 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Jerry McCrary, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Jerry McCrary. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order [ECF No. 4] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Discovery [ ECF No. 5] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel [ECF No. 6] is DENIED as moot. An Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/4/14. (CSG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.