Rodgers v. Vilsack
Plaintiff: Curtis C. Rodgers
Defendant: Thomas J Vilsack
Case Number: 2:2014cv00081
Filed: August 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Hannibal Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: Nannette A. Baker
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. [Doc. 3.] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.A separate Judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. 3 Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 7/23/15. (CLA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodgers v. Vilsack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curtis C. Rodgers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas J Vilsack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?