Walton v. Bilinski et al
Plaintiff: Cody Lee Walton
Defendant: Ryszard Bilinski and Macon County, MO
Case Number: 2:2015cv00036
Filed: May 14, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Hannibal Office
County: Macon
Presiding Judge: Nannette A. Baker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 65 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Ryszard Bilinskis Motion for Summary Judgment 53 is GRANTED. A separate Judgment is entered this date. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 2/8/18. (KJS)
July 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's fourth motion to dismiss [#34] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service is deemed effected on April 15, 2016. Defendant must file his answer or other responsive pleading within tw enty (20) days of the date of this order. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that defendants motion to strike [#34] is GRANTED as to paragraphs 3, 4, 19, and 20, and DENIED as to paragraphs 5, 22, 23, 24, and 28. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on July 6, 2016. (MCB)
December 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss [# 12 ], second motion to dismiss [# 15 ], and third motion to dismiss [# 27 ] are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motions to strike [# 12 ], [# 15 ], and [# 27 ] are DENIED AS MOOT with leave to refile once defendant is properly a party to this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have an additional 120 days from the date of this order to attempt service on defendant. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/30/2015. (CBL)
July 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to this Court's differentiated case management system, this case is assigned to Track 5B (prisoner actions-standard). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall include a copy of this order when either serving the complaint upon defendants or requesting that defendants waive service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after either being properly served with a copy of the complaint or filing a waiver of service, defendants shall reply to the complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See 42 U.S.C. ' 1997e(g)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 7/20/15. (KJS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walton v. Bilinski et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cody Lee Walton
Represented By: Stephen Sherman Wyse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryszard Bilinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Macon County, MO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?