Doyel et al v. McDonald's Corporation
| Amy Doyel, Michael Doyel and Alex Prodes |
| McDonald's Corporation |
| 4:2008cv01198 |
| August 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Contract: Other Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for class certification is DENIED. [Doc. 118 ] Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 8/12/10. (KJF)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss and motion to strike or dismiss class allegations is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. [Doc. 64] The motion is granted as to plaintiffs' claims arising prior to January 1, 2007 brought pursuant to the Missouri Minimum Wage Law, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 290.500, et seq.; plaintiffs claims brought pursuant toMissouri's record keeping statute, Mo. Rev. Stat.§ 290.520 (Count II); and plaintiffs' clai ms for injunctive and declaratory relief brought pursuant to the Missouri Minimum Wage Law, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 290.500, et seq. The motion is denied in all other respects. Re: 64 MOTION to Dismiss Case and Motion to Strike or Dismiss Class Allegations filed by Defendant McDonald's Corporation motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 2/10/2009. (NCL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
