In Re: In the Matter of the Complaint of American Commercial Lines, LLC
||July 1, 2011
||Missouri Eastern District Court
||St. Louis Office
||Charles A. Shaw
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 19, 2011
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Order Approving Letter of Undertaking as Ad Interim Stipulation, Restraining Suit, Fixing Deadline for Filing Claims, and Directing Issuance of Notice is DENIED without preju dice. [Doc. 3] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall, no later than August 18, 2011, deposit with the Court either the sum required by the previously-filed Affidavit of Value and the applicable provisions of Rule F, or security therefor i n a form acceptable to the Clerk of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later August 18, 2011, plaintiff shall file a motion for the issuance of notice to claimants, which shall: (1) recite plaintiff's compliance with the Court' ;s security requirements, (2) contain plaintiff's proposed language for such a notice and a detailed proposal for the means of publication of such a notice, and (3) list every person known to have made any claim against the plaintiff or the vess el at issue arising out of the incident on which the claims sought to be limited arose. In all applicable respects, plaintiff's proposal shall comply with the requirements of Rule F(4) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims. (Response to Court due by 8/18/2011.) Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 7/19/2011. (NCL)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.