United States of America v. Peters et al
| United States of America and St Louis County |
| Gerald Peters, Darlene Peters and JP Morgan Chase Bank |
| 4:2012cv01395 |
| August 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Audrey G. Fleissig |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Darlene Peterss motion for relief from judgment is DENIED. (Doc. No. 122 .) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 11/24/2014. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
119
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for a stay is DENIED. (Doc. No. 106.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a stay will be automatic if a supersedeas bond of $50,000 is posted by Defendants on or before October 20, 2 014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the temporary stay of enforcement of the Order of Sale (Doc. No. 98) shall remain in effect until October 20, 2014. If by October 20, 2014, the Defendants move for a stay in the Eighth Circuit, the temporary sta y shall remain in effect until the Eighth Circuits disposition of the Defendants motion. During the stay, Defendants must continue to abide by this Courts prior directive to take all reasonable steps to preserve the property in its current condition. (See Doc. No. 98 at 4-6.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/6/2014. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ms. Peters shall have up to and including September 2, 2014 to show cause why a supersedeas bond should be set in an amount less than the full amount of the judgment or waived. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that enforcement of the Order of Sale (Doc. No. 98) is temporarily STAYED pending the Courts ruling on Ms. Peters' motion for a stay. (Doc. No. 106.) Show Cause Response due by 9/2/2014. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/22/2014. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Gerald Peters' "Response to Memorandum and Order of 5/27/2014" is DENIED. (Doc. No. 92.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/21/2014. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 59.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Darlene Peters' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Doc. No. 66.) IT IS FURTHE R ORDERED that on or before June 20, 2014, the United States shall file for entry by the Court a proposed Order of Sale enforcing the judgment in this matter against the Ailanthus Property. A separate judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. (Response to Court due by 6/20/2014.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 6/11/2014. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of Mr. Harry Charles, counsel for Defendant Gerald Peters, to withdraw from this action is GRANTED, for the reasons set forth in the motion. (Doc. No. 76.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Peters is granted ten days, through Thursday, May 22, 2014, to obtain substitute counsel. ( Response to Court due by 5/22/2014.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/12/14. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Darlene Peters motion to reconvene mediation in this matter is GRANTED, with the condition that the conference be limited to one half day. Each party shall bear its own costs with respe ct to this additional session. (Doc. No. 54.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the ADR referral in this matter is extended through Friday, January17, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government is granted leave to participate by telephone in the additional mediation session. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Peters shall make full disclosure of any interests she has in any trusts not later than Monday, December 30, 2013. Further, to the extent she seeks to settle the claims based on an inability to pay, Ms. Peters shall submit, not later than ten (10) days prior to the mediation conference, a signed Form 433-A. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the deadline for the filing of summary judgment motions in this matter is extended to Friday, January 31, 2014. (Dispositive Motions due by 1/31/2014.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/23/2013. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before November 4, 2013, Defendant Darlene Peters shall either file with the Court or provide to appointed counsel a signed copy of the engagement letter and Limited Representation Appearance for m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Defendant fails to timely file or provide to counsel the necessary signed documents, the Court will terminate Ms. Cohens appointment in this matter. Thereafter, Ms. Peters will proceed pro se for all purposes, inc luding ADR, until such time, if ever, as she retains counsel. Defendant is again reminded that as a pro se litigant, she is required to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules and practices of this Court. See United St ates v. Green, 691 F.3d 960, 965-66 (8th Cir. 2012) (holding that the right of self- representation is not a license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law) (quoting Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 834 n. 46 (1975)).. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/23/2013. (RAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
