Clark v. State of Missouri

Clark v. State of Missouri

Petitioner:	Raphael Clark
Respondent:	State of Missouri
Case Number:	4:2013cv00623
Filed:	April 1, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Jean C. Hamilton
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 23, 2013	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motion for leave to file a brief in excess length [Doc. #3] is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners application for writ of habeascorpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED petitioners motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #4] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at petitioners motion to amend his motion to recall the mandate, filed with the Missouri Court of Appeals on October 13, 2010 [Doc. #5] is DENIED as this Court is without jurisdiction to so order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue.An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. 5 4 2 3 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 7/23/13. (CLA)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 23, 2013

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motion for leave to file a brief in excess length [Doc. #3] is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners application for writ of habeascorpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED petitioners motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #4] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at petitioners motion to amend his motion to recall the mandate, filed with the Missouri Court of Appeals on October 13, 2010 [Doc. #5] is DENIED as this Court is without jurisdiction to so order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue.An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. 5 4 2 3 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 7/23/13. (CLA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. State of Missouri
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Raphael Clark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: State of Missouri
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?