Torvisco v. Missouri Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
||Missouri Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Janet Napolitano and Eric H. Holder
||Carlos Humberto Torvisco
||June 12, 2013
||Missouri Eastern District Court
||St. Louis Office
||Catherine D. Perry
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 24, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's Application for a Certificate of Appealability Requesting Stay Pending Appeal [Doc. # 9 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [Doc. # 8 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability if he appeals this Order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on October 24, 2013. (BRP)
|September 16, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent's motion to dismiss [# 3 ] is GRANTED, and Carlos Humberto Torvisco's "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Emergency Request for Preliminary Injunc tion Staying Removal Pending Resolution of the Writ" [ # 1 ] is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 09/16/2013. (CBL)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.