Hutchinson et al v. Pacific Indemnity Company
| Samuel Hutchinson and Laurna Hutchinson |
| Pacific Indemnity Company |
| 4:2014cv00753 |
| April 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| John A. Ross |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Samuel Hutchinson and Laurna Hutchinson's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I of Plaintiffs' Complaint (ECF No. 18 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Pa cific Indemnity Company's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FINALLLY ORDERED that Defendant Pacific Indemnity Company's Request for Oral Argument (ECF No. 33 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/1/15. (KXS)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Samuel Hutchinson and Laurna Hutchinson's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I of Plaintiffs' Complaint (ECF No. 18 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Pacific Indemnity Company's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FINALLLY ORDERED that Defendant Pacific Indemnity Company's Request for Oral Argument (ECF No. 33 ) is DENIED as moot. An appropriate Judgment is filed herewith. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 8/25/2015. (NEB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
