Jean-Gilles v. Jean-Gilles
Carlos E. Jean-Gilles |
Fabiola Jean-Gilles, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Nation Wide Title Clearing and 177 Thompson Street Owners Corp. |
4:2014cv00827 |
April 30, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - City |
Jean C. Hamilton |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Fabiola Jean-Gilles Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Revised Third Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 67 ), is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Carlos Jean-Gilles claims against her are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant 177 Thompson Owners Corp.s Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 60 ), is GRANTED and Mr. Jean-Gilles claims against it are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 73 ), is GRANTED and Mr. Jean-Gilles claims against it are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendant Nationwide Title Clearings Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 75 ), is GRANTED, and Mr. Jean-Gilles claims against it are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A separate judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 12/1/14. (KJS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.