Shanks v. St. Louis County, Missouri

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Eastern District Shanks v. St. Louis County, Missouri

Shanks v. St. Louis County, Missouri

Plaintiff:	Chad Shanks
Defendant:	St. Louis County, Missouri
Case Number:	4:2014cv01599
Filed:	September 12, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Henry Edward Autrey
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 5
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 18, 2016	Filing 43 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Combined Motion to Conditionally Certify Class, Order Disclosure of Putative Class Members' Names and Contact Information, and to Facilitate Class Notice [Doc. No. 37] is gr anted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court conditionally certifies a class of all current and former hourly-paid animal control officers employed by Defendant during the period of three (3) years from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at Plaintiffs Notice of Your Right to Join Lawsuit and Consent Form, (Ex. 12) are approved and shall be disseminated by regular mail and email and by posting notice in the company's breakrooms. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall provide to Plaintiffs counsel within 10 days from the date of this Opinion a computer readable data file containing the name, last known mailing address and email address, and dates of employment for each putative member of the conditionally certified class. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties will provide a status report to the court within 90 days of the date of this order and every 90 days thereafter. 37 ( Response to Court due by 5/18/2016.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/18/16. (CLA)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 18, 2016

Filing 43 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Combined Motion to Conditionally Certify Class, Order Disclosure of Putative Class Members' Names and Contact Information, and to Facilitate Class Notice [Doc. No. 37] is gr anted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court conditionally certifies a class of all current and former hourly-paid animal control officers employed by Defendant during the period of three (3) years from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at Plaintiffs Notice of Your Right to Join Lawsuit and Consent Form, (Ex. 12) are approved and shall be disseminated by regular mail and email and by posting notice in the company's breakrooms. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall provide to Plaintiffs counsel within 10 days from the date of this Opinion a computer readable data file containing the name, last known mailing address and email address, and dates of employment for each putative member of the conditionally certified class. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties will provide a status report to the court within 90 days of the date of this order and every 90 days thereafter. 37 ( Response to Court due by 5/18/2016.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/18/16. (CLA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shanks v. St. Louis County, Missouri
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad Shanks
Represented By:	Russell C. Riggan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: St. Louis County, Missouri
Represented By:	Michael E. Hughes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?