Dinnius v. USA

Dinnius v. USA

Petitioner:	Jerry Dinnius
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	4:2014cv02010
Filed:	December 4, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Jean C. Hamilton
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 27, 2015	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct illegal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 is DENIED AND DISMISSED AS TIME-BARRED. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 2255 Proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a Certificate of Appealability. 28 U.S.C. ' 2253. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 02/27/2015. (CLK)
January 13, 2015	Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant shall show cause, in writing and no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed as time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if movant fails to comply with this Order, this action will be dismissed. Response to Court due by 2/13/2015. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 1/13/15. (CLA)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 27, 2015

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct illegal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 is DENIED AND DISMISSED AS TIME-BARRED. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 2255 Proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a Certificate of Appealability. 28 U.S.C. ' 2253. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 02/27/2015. (CLK)

January 13, 2015

Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant shall show cause, in writing and no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed as time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if movant fails to comply with this Order, this action will be dismissed. Response to Court due by 2/13/2015. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 1/13/15. (CLA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dinnius v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerry Dinnius
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Kenneth R. Tihen(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?