Blue Buffalo Co., Ltd. v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company
Plaintiff: Blue Buffalo Company, Ltd.
Defendant: Nestle Purina PetCare Company
Case Number: 4:2015cv00384
Filed: March 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Within US but Outside District
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 193 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Blue Buffalos Amended Motion to Dismiss 129 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part in accordance with the terms of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Purina shall file an amended counterclaim in accordance with the terms of this Memorandum and Order no later than July 11, 2016. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 6/13/16. (CAR)
February 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 160 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Non-Party Subpoena Respondent Leo Burnett Company, Inc.'s motion to quash Plaintiff Blue Buffalo's subpoena for documents # 137 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. To the extent the mo tion is granted, the subpoena is quashed without prejudice. To the extent the motion is denied, Leo Burnett shall produce the marketing analytics documents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Blue Buffalo and Leo Burnett shall meet and confer in an effort to reach agreement on the details of a cost-shifting arrangement.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 2/23/16. (LGK)
June 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 88 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Purinas Motion to Dismiss #[ 39 ] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Blue Buffalo shall file an amended complaint within twenty (20) days of this Order to bring it into conformity with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Purinas Motion to Stay Discovery pending the Courts ruling on its motion to dismiss #[ 72 ] is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 6/10/15. (KJS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blue Buffalo Co., Ltd. v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nestle Purina PetCare Company
Represented By: Richard M. Assmus
Represented By: Keri E. Borders
Represented By: Carmine R. Zarlenga, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Blue Buffalo Company, Ltd.
Represented By: Robert A. Atkins
Represented By: Martin Flumenbaum
Represented By: Darren W. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?