Thompson et al v. St. Peters, Missouri, City of, et al.
| Gina Thompson and Karen McCabe |
| St. Peters, Missouri, City of, Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. and DOES 1-24 |
| 4:2015cv00404 |
| March 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Charles |
| Ronnie L. White |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDEREI) that Defendant Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs Complaint for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction (ECF No. 97 ) is GRANTED. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on April 21, 2017. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Redflex Traffic System, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 17 ) is GRANTED as to Counts VI and VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Redflex Traffic Syst em, Inc.'s Supplemental Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 60 ) is GRANTED as to Counts V, VIII and IX, and is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Redflex Traffic System, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Sum mary Judgment (ECF. No. 62 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counts V, VI, VII, VIII, and IX of Plaintiffs' Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 4 ) are DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on November 1, 2016. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Peters' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 57 ) is GRANTED. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 10/24/2016. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate Actions (ECF No. 46 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (ECF No. 51 ) and Motion to Exte nd Deadlines Set at the Rule 16 Conference (ECF No. 70 ) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Peters, Missouri's Motion for More Definite Statement and/or to Strike (ECF No. 22 ) is DENIED. Defendant shall file an Answer to the Petition no later than May 2, 2016. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on April 21, 2016. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion to Stay (ECF No. 19 ) is GRANTED in part, consistent with this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay (ECF No. 27 ) is GRANTE D and this case is STAYED for 60 days pending the determination of the Missouri Supreme Court regarding the red light camera program. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Redflex Tra ffic Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Defendant City of St. Peters, Missouri's Motion for More Definite Statement and/or to Strike (ECF No. 28 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file responses to the pending motions no later than 10 days after this Court lifts the stay. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion for Extension of Time to file a Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and Discovery (ECF No. 29 ) is GRANTED. Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiffs class certification motion no later than 30 days after the stay is lifted. (Case stayed) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 5/13/2015. (NEB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
