Shaffran v. Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. et al
4:2004cv00285 |
March 29, 2004 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Kansas City Office |
Sarah W. Hays |
Selective Service |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 ORDER - ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #56) is granted. It is furtherORDERED that plaintiff is awarded $88,276.42, less the market value of any of the 2,517.867 shares in question currently owned by plaintiff and less the value received if any of the 2,517.867 shares in question were previously sold by plaintiff. It is furtherORDERED that plaintiffs counsel is given thirty days in which file a request for attorney fees. Defendant is given thirty days thereafter in which to oppose the request. It is furtherORDERED that Defendant Lucent Technologies, Inc.s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc.#54) is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays on 3/31/2009. (Gicinto, JoRita) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shaffran v. Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.