Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC v. Google, Inc. Featured Case
Plaintiff: Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC
Defendant: Google, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2013cv00356
Filed: April 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Andrew
Presiding Judge: Ortrie D. Smith
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2013 Filing 30 Order of Dismissal entered by Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes, Renea)
September 13, 2013 Filing 29 Joint MOTION to dismiss case filed by Paul A. Lesko on behalf of Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/30/2013 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Lesko, Paul)
August 2, 2013 Filing 28 RULES OF TRIAL. Signed on 8/2/2013 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Hopkins, Karen)
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 10/20/2014. Pretrial Conference set for 3/19/2015 at 10:00 AM in Chambers before District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. Jury Trial set for 4/20/2015 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8D, Kansas City (ODS) before District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. Dispositive Motions due by 11/20/2014. A claim construction hearing will be held, if necessary, at 9:00 a.m. 4/18/2014. Signed on 8/1/2013 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Hopkins, Karen)
July 30, 2013 Filing 26 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC. (Lesko, Paul)
July 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting 24 motion for extension of time. Parties' joint proposed scheduling order and discovery plan should be filed on or before July 30, 2013. Signed on 7-23-13 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached.(Hoberock, Meredith)
July 23, 2013 Filing 24 Joint MOTION for extension of time to file proposed scheduling order and discovery plan filed by Jay Heidrick on behalf of Google, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/9/2013 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Heidrick, Jay)
June 20, 2013 Filing 23 ANSWER to 21 Amended Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC on behalf of Google, Inc..(Jones, Russell)
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER entered by Judge Ortrie Smith denying 17 motion to reassign/transfer case. (Matthes, Renea)
June 7, 2013 Filing 21 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Google, Inc. filed by Matthew Lee Dameron on behalf of Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G)(Dameron, Matthew)
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting 18 19 motions to appear pro hac vice approved by Clerk of Court. Attorneys Dara M Kurlancheek and Brian A Rosenthal for Google, Inc. allowed to appear pro hac vice. Copy of Order and CM/ECF Registration forms mailed to Dara M Kurlancheek and Brian A Rosenthal This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorneys. (Martin, Jan)
June 6, 2013 Filing 19 Motion to allow Brian Rosenthal to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number 0866-3551378) filed by Russell S. Jones, Jr on behalf of Google, Inc.. (Jones, Russell)
June 6, 2013 Filing 18 Motion to allow Dara Kurlancheek to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number 0866-3551357) filed by Russell S. Jones, Jr on behalf of Google, Inc.. (Jones, Russell)
June 6, 2013 Filing 17 MOTION to reassign/transfer case (Unopposed) filed by Matthew Lee Dameron on behalf of Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/24/2013 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Dameron, Matthew)
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting 15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Google, Inc. answer due 6/10/2013. Signed on 6/3/13 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached.(Wolfe, Steve)
June 3, 2013 Filing 15 Second MOTION for extension of time to file answer re 1 Complaint, filed by Russell S. Jones, Jr on behalf of Google, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/20/2013 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) 1 ) (Jones, Russell)
May 31, 2013 Filing 14 NOTICE of appearance by Jay Heidrick on behalf of Google, Inc. (Heidrick, Jay)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting 11 and 12 motions to appear pro hac vice approved by Clerk of Court. Attorneys Edward D Johnson and Stephen E Baskin for Google, Inc. allowed to appear pro hac vice. Copy of Order and CM/ECF Registration forms mailed to Edward D. Johnson and Stephen E. Baskin This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. (Martin, Jan)
May 24, 2013 Filing 12 Motion to allow Stephen E. Baskin to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number 0866-3537314) filed by Russell S. Jones, Jr on behalf of Google, Inc.. (Jones, Russell)
May 24, 2013 Filing 11 Motion to allow Edward D. Johnson to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number 0866-3537293) filed by Russell S. Jones, Jr on behalf of Google, Inc.. (Jones, Russell)
May 15, 2013 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Matthew Lee Dameron on behalf of Plaintiff Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC.(Dameron, Matthew)
May 15, 2013 Filing 9 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Russell S. Jones, Jr on behalf of Defendant Google, Inc..(Jones, Russell)
May 6, 2013 Filing 8 NOTICE of appearance by Russell S. Jones, Jr on behalf of Google, Inc. (Jones, Russell)
April 30, 2013 Filing 7 Rule 16 Notice. Proposed scheduling order due by 7/23/2013. Rule 26 conference due by 7/9/2013. Corporate disclosures due by 5/15/13. Signed on 4/30/2013 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Hopkins, Karen)
April 26, 2013 Filing 6 NOTICE of filing Notice of Related Cases by Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC (Dameron, Matthew)
April 25, 2013 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC. Google, Inc. served on 4/12/2013, answer due 6/3/2013. (Dameron, Matthew)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting 3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant is directed to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before 6/3/2013. Signed on 4/25/13 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached.(Hoberock, Meredith)
April 25, 2013 Filing 3 MOTION for extension of time to file answer Or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Russell S. Jones, Jr on behalf of Google, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/13/2013 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Jones, Russell)
April 10, 2013 Filing 2 Notice of EAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: # 1 EAP General Order)(Chorny, Traci)
April 10, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Google, Inc. filed by Matthew Lee Dameron on behalf of Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC. Filing fee $350, receipt number 0866-3484532. Service due by 8/12/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dameron, Matthew)
April 10, 2013 NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION. A modification has been made to the document filed on 4/10/2013 as Document No. 3, Notice of EAP assignment to an outside mediator. The document was deleted as it was a duplicate filing to doc. 2. This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (Chorny, Traci)
April 10, 2013 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Google, Inc.. (Chorny, Traci)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC v. Google, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC
Represented By: Sarah S. Burns
Represented By: Matthew Lee Dameron
Represented By: Paul A. Lesko
Represented By: Norman Eli Siegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google, Inc.
Represented By: Jay Heidrick
Represented By: Russell S. Jones, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?