USA v. Stute Company, Inc., et al
Case Number: 4:2001cv00369
Filed: July 16, 2001
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: David L. Piester
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 84 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The motion for stay (filing 67) and motion attacking the order of sale (filing 63) (referred to in the opinion of the Court of Appeals) are dismissed as moot pursuant to the direction of the Court of Appeals. No later than June 30, 2005, the United States shall advise the undersigned and all other parties whether it wishes the undersigned to grant its motion to vacate and dismiss (filing 74) or whether the United States wishes to withdraw the motion. All other partie s shall have 10 days after the government's response to advise the undersigned of their views. In the absence of a timely response by the United States, this court will without further notice enter an order finding that the motion by the United States to vacate and dismiss (filing 74) is withdrawn, and this action shall be closed.***Set/Reset All Deadlines: Case Management Deadline set for 7/10/2005. Signed by Judge Richard G. Kopf on 5/31/2005. (JAR, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Stute Company, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?