United States of America v. Wuster
||Scott E. Wuster
||United States of America
||February 3, 2009
||Nebraska District Court
||Real Property: Foreclosure Office
||Richard G. Kopf
||David L. Piester
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||U.S. Government Plaintiff
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 29, 2009
JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF FORECLOSURE AND ORDER OF SALE in the amount of $55,790.91 plus accrued interest of 0.48 percent computed daily and compounded annually until paid in full; setting priority of liens and directing sale of premises; granting Plaintiff USA's motion for default judgment 10 against Defendant Scott E. Wuster. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to Scott E. Wuster via U.S. Mail)(LKH) Modified on 7/1/2009 to correct typing error (LKH).
|October 26, 2009
ORDER regarding MOTION to Confirm Sale 17 filed by United States of America. Any person wishing to object to confirmation of the Marshal's sale conducted herein shall, not later than November 16, 2009, file with the Clerk and serve upon the par ties to this action a written objection to confirmation of sale setting forth the basis for said objection. In the event that an objection to confirmation of sale is filed by the date specified above, all issues raised by said objection will be heard before the Court at 12:00 p.m. on November 23, 2009, in Courtroom 1, Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, Nebraska. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copies mailed as directed)(JAB)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.