Srour v. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff: Jamil Srour
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security
Case Number: 4:2009cv03179
Filed: August 25, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf (REFERRAL JUDGE)
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 10 Motion to Change Venue and 4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 8/25/2009. (rban, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 8/25/2009.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Srour v. Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamil Srour
Represented By: Ivan Yacub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Gerard J. Mene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?