UNL Technology Development Corporation et al v. Voichahoske et al
| UNL Technology Development Corporation and Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska |
| Mike Voichahoske, Voichahoske Bros., Ted Chlopek, Community Feed and Seed Store and John Does 1-25 |
| 4:2011cv03147 |
| August 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Patent |
| 07 U.S.C. ยง 2321 Plant Variety Protection Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 20 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. The motion to withdraw filed by Edward H. Tricker, Monica L. Freeman, and the law firm of Woods & Aitken LLP, counsel of record for defendants Mike Voichahoske and Voichahoske Bros., is granted. Defendants Mike Voichahoske and Voichahoske Bros. are given until November 30, 2011 to either: (a) obtain the services of substitute counsel and have that attorney file an appearance on their behalf; or (2) file a statement notifying the court of their intent to litigate this case without counsel. If Mike Voichahoske and/or Voichahoske Bros. fail to comply with this order, upon the plaintiffs' motion, the court may enter a default and/or default judgment against the non-complying defendant. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed as directed)(JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
